Wow. Just, wow.
The Young Turks talk about climate change
A word about forest efficiency
Scientists are hard at working devising new ‘technologies’ that can strip carbon dioxide out of the air. There is even a prize for the most efficient inventions that can capture this carbon and put it to good use; twitter is abuzz with the hashtag #reimagineCO<sub>2</sub>. But you know, I already know that the most efficient, sustainable oxygen factory (that also happens to double as a carbon sink) is none other than a natural forest:
Imagine this robotic-like device that can adsorb CO2 molecules at the ppb level directly out of the Earth’s atmosphere through a process of reverse-osmosis and then transmorgify those carbon atoms into stiff and lightweight fractal-laminar-nano-composite material that is 100% biodegradeable, 100% compostable and 100% renewable! Once the carbon dioxide molecules are split into their atomic components, one of the only gaseous waste byproducts is diatomic oxygen²!! It gets better. It’s solar powered, of course!!! And believe it or not, but it uses *self-assembling technology*!!!! Really — this thing, it just unfolds itself to the final shape in front of your very eyes!!!!! Literally all you do is wait and let it do its thing!!!!!! And did I mention that it is self-repairing? Meaning it will heal its own damaged components!!!!!!! It’s that simple!!!!!!!! And it works!!!!!!!!!! It actually works!!!!!!!!!! This incredible machine, okay, will keep on going even if sections of it are completely hacked off!!!!!!!!!!! And it is like a 3D printer, so it will literally print practically unlimited copies of itself!!!!!!!!!!!! I am going to be the world’s first trillionaire!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have almost lost count of how many exclamation points I am using here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ²And if you’re paying atttention, even the fineprint is good—the only other byproducts are aromatic hydrocarbons that are shown to enhance mood levels in the general human population.
I might be wrong about this but I’m willing to bet that the more biodiverse a forest is, the more carbon it can absorb. Simply because a dense tropical rainforest has more biomass than a ‘monoculture’ crop (soil is another matter).
So. We already have the ‘technology’ in the form of trees. All we have to do is reverse the landclearing. That’s why when someone tells you the best advice they can give is to “plant a tree”, they are almost certainly correct.
What’s new with GMO?
Today I’m going to do things a bit differently.
I‘d like to encourage my followers to read several articles I just found out about. So here are several interesting pieces of news regarding CRISPR, a new gene-editing technique and a couple of links to the first ever completely synthetic, artificial cell:
- http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/monsanto-nets-first-crispr-license-to-modify-crops-with-key-restrictions/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/10/crispr-diagnostics-gene-cutting/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/23/florida-keys-mosquitoes-genetically-modified/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/08/05/mosquitoes-genetically-modified-florida-zika/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/08/18/genetic-code-synthetic-life/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/18/crispr-off-target-effects/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/16/crispr-first-human-trial-cancer/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/21/crispr-experiment-humans/
- https://www.statnews.com/2015/11/17/gene-editing-embryo-crispr/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/02/synthetic-human-genome/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/09/superbugs-antibiotic-resistance-mcr1/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/07/superbug-new-gene-discovery/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/02/project-human-genome-synthesis/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/04/synthetic-genome-church-endy/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/13/harvard-meeting-synthetic-genome/
- http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell-constructed-by-j-craig-venter-institute-researcher/home/
- http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703559004575256470152341984
- https://www.newscientist.com/article/2082278-artificial-cell-designed-in-lab-reveals-genes-essential-to-life/
Please read all of the above articles and educate yourselves. This isn’t in the mainstream news, but it should be.
I should probably state here that I don’t even pretend to know about genetics. I’m not a geneticist, I studied Materials Science.
All I do know is that nature has laws and you cannot break those laws. Bacterial diseases are lifeorms too and they are just as robust and ‘innovative’ as even the cleverest of humans.
I think that scientists often tend to overestimate their own intelligence level, and at the same time, underestimate the resourcefulness of nature itself. I don’t think we can ever fully predict the “revenge effect”. But it is there. The risk is always there.
I’m sure the field of genetics is really, really advanced by now. I’m not saying that it’s not. But the big worry for me is just that— as science becomes more and more and more specialised, people get ‘cleverer’ but they don’t always become ‘wiser’. So to put that another way, the greatest geneticist minds may claim to know all about genes, and they might even be right, but then they cannot also be the greatest experts in ecosystems. The fields of science are that big today that no one can know everything. It’s impossible! That’s the big worry.
“I don’t think it represents the creation of an artificial life form,” said biomedical engineer James Collins at Boston University. “I view this as an organism with a synthetic genome, not as a synthetic organism. It is tough to draw where the line is.” [source]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- …
- 70
- Next Page »