Brenton Tarrant live stream – full video

New Zealand Christchurch mosque attack

If you try to upload this video to youtube, they will terminate your entire account. You won’t get any warnings. You won’t get any second chances. Or even any strikes. They won’t leave your other videos up. They’ll just de-platform you. Instantly. Even if you are famous. It doesn’t matter who you are. How do I know? Well I tried it on a backup youtube channel (which had no restrictions whatsoever) and that’s exactly what happened. Both google and Youtube hate this video. This goes beyond normal censorship.

I do not think that the video should be censored at all unless all of the corresponding church attack videos by islamic terrrorists are censored also. That seems fair. Are they? No. We see people being blown up all over the place by muslim extremists. Of course, government authorities already know full well that they would be a lot harder to censor, because they are happening almost every day around the world – in one country or another.

Are we really surprised about this? Muslim extremists can’t keep attacking non-muslim people time and time again and think nothing is ever going to happen in return. The world doesn’t work that way. People feel the need for retribution. People want revenge. What was written on Brenton Tarrant’s gun? “Rotheram”, that’s what. You can google that for yourself.

I just want to make it perfectly clear that I do not condone Brenton Tarrant’s actions.

That doesn’t mean I think islam should be continually given a free pass though. Because up until that terror incident, things were very one-sided, with non-muslims having committed far far less corresponding terror attacks than muslims. Now, muslims can use this tragic event as an example of “islamophobia”. And they do. They’re doing it now. Using this attack as “proof” that not everyone loves islam. Well I’m sorry to have to say this, but the truth of the matter is that not everyone loves islam.

Now I’ve read Brenton Tarrant’s manifesto/manuscript or whatever you want to call it. Why did I read it? Because I am a researcher and I wanted to get to the root cause of why someone would do such a horrific thing (if they aren’t some kind of brainwashed extremist nutcase). Why would an otherwise sane young healthy Western man with western values do this? What did I find out?

Well like it or not, the root cause of this incident was, still is, muslim immigration and islamisation. It’s not about guns. I’m not a fan of guns. But if this person wasn’t able to access guns, he would have used some other method. And he even detailed that in his writings. So banning guns won’t stop these mosque attacks. It’s what’s inside mosque that is the target. Muslims. Someone like Brenton Tarrant would have simply found some other way to kill them.

The main reason that I have decided to upload the video onto my website is because I think the Western world has to start talking more about immigration and about multiculturalism in general. At the moment, any criticism of islam or immigration is seen as a very taboo subject. It’s seen as very politically incorrect.

Having said that, speaking only for myself, I do feel it is time that a clear line is drawn in the sand. I have personally reached my “tolerance limit” with respect to islamisation. This is the point where I’m not willing to concede any more to islam. I’m at saturation point already. I’m done. I’m not afraid to say “no” anymore. My psychologist calls it “setting boundaries”. Many more Europeans feel like this today than Australians. So I’m surprised that it wasn’t a European that did this.

If people can’t even talk about the issue without having an egg cracked on the back of their head, or a milkshake thrown over them, then this is exactly the sort of thing that is going to happen more frequently. People need to be able to have their opinions heard, their frustrations vented, without being verbally attacked or banned or whatever.

In France, praying in the street is banned (as it should be). In fact it’s been banned for almost a decade. And guess what? Muslims didn’t die. They learned to cope, adapt, adjust. Same too with their infamous burkini ban. Although persistent muslims are one again testing the boundaries of this law… In Denmark, the niqab is banned.

But it’s not just non-muslim countries that are doing this. Muslim countries are setting boundaries as well. The burka is banned in Morocco for instance. Tunisia has also recently banned the niqab in government buildings.

So if it’s okay for islamic countries to set these sorts of boundaries, why isn’t it okay for non-muslim countries to do so?

For most people, if you say the wrong thing you can easily lose your job. Tweet the wrong thing and you can be fined or even imprisoned. In the UK at least.

You see, we’re so afraid of being labeled “racist” or “islamophobic” or “white-supremacist”, that we ignore all the bad things about islam. Instead, we put islam onto a pedestal. We say things like “not all muslims are terrorists”. For several decades already, islam has been untouchable. You couldn’t criticise islam. Nowadays, you can’t even use the word “muslim” in England anymore, the politically correct term is “Asian”. Well that, I think, has gone too far. Because pakistan is right next door to Iran and Afghanistan,  and that’s the country which this term is referring to. And it ain’t no where near in Asia, it’s the Middle East.

Today, if you criticise islam, you’re an outcast. You’re a dissident. You’re ostracised. As I write this, facebook has completely de-platformed me. I think it was because I shared a photo of Tommy Robinson and hashtagged it #TommyRobinson. That’s all I did.

I had my second youtube “community guidelines” strike earlier this week, meaning I’m banned from uploading new videos for 2 weeks (last time it was one week). Mainly because I uploaded a video about muslim migrants bragging about how they gang-raped a virgin. That went against their “sex and nudity policy” apparently.

Twitter also has effectively shadow-banned me. If I don’t delete the “offending” tweet, I won’t be able to tweet anything ever again. My profile is still visible. But I can’t tweet anything. What good is that to me? To everyone else, it looks as though nothing has happened. Right now, it simply looks as though I have nothing to say on twitter. Well no. Last month, LinkedIn even banned me (that ban was essentially indefinite, until I agreed in writing to their terms and conditions once again).

Even now, blasphemy laws are very close to being introduced right under our own very noses. Why?

Is it because we’re afraid of violent muslim protesters?
Is it because we’re afraid of stirring up ethnic religious tensions?
Or is it because muslims can’t handle any form of criticism of the prophet muhammad?

If so, that’s their problem. It’s certainly not our problem. They have to learn to grow a thicker skin. It’s they that have to learn to adapt and be more tolerant of us, not the other way around. To me, if they can’t handle it, well then they can just bugger off and go and apply to live in pakistan or some other country where these things can’t be criticised without the death penalty being applied.

If everyone appeases islam all the time and puts islamic priorities above everything else, including their own religion (or lack of religion), then eventually, given time, you will be living in an islamic country. I have no doubt about it. Islamists keep pushing and pushing and pushing. If they had their way, you would be attending a mosque. I’m not saying all muslims are like this, but still, some of them are. And it’s not racist to say that either, because I recognise that not all muslims are the same as each other.

It’s like muslims have been given what I call “special privileges”. But what about my “buddhist privileges”? Eh? Where did they go? Did I ever have them? For example, I find animal cruelty videos offensive and unacceptable. So would most Buddhists I imagine. Even so, youtube allows people with millions of followers to upload videos of animals placed in a small arena which they can’t escape and they fight until death. That is against my religion. Our religion? Does anyone listen to our Buddhist wants and desires? No. Why aren’t we treating islam exactly the same as all other religions? If we’re not treating it equally, then we ourselves are being ‘racist’ (or religionist) – and it’s our own fault!

The day after the NZ attack, I observed something very interesting. The prime minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, wore a hijab. She is not even a muslim and yet she felt obliged to wear a hijab of all things. Yet over in Iran, some of the most progressive, liberal women like Masih Alinejad are very outspoken and actively campaigning against what for them is forced hijab wearing. They are literally living in self-exile for fear of returning to Iran! Do we expect muslim leaders to wear a cross around their neck for every church attack? Would they? No.

I don’t live in New Zealand. Even so, I don’t want to see my prime minister ever wearing a hijab. It’s just not necessary. It’s just one more example in the long line of incessant examples of islamisation. Later that week, muslim prayers were broadcast over the whole of New Zealand. But this is precisely what people like myself are getting sick and tired of. It’s the ever-encroaching pervasiveness of islam. And they’ll do it after every single attack, as if it improves relations and solidarity. I don’t want to hear that pathetic wailing about some superior yet non-existent deity. I just don’t. It’s a step backwards in my opinion. And that is my personal preference.

If it’s not the jijab and covering up of women, or noisy bloody calls to prayer, it’s halal meat. But I for one don’t want to eat halal meat on an airplane or in a hospital. Where did I sign up for that? When? I never did. See, we’re being fed this garbage without even realising it, without even knowing it. And we’re paying unnecessary muslim organisations to certify for all of this bullshit too. Why? Can you imagine the uproar in the muslim world if they were unwittingly eating kosher food, with profits being siphoned off towards Israel?

Some muslims aren’t used to hearing about intolerant Westerners. That’s because they’ve had it good for years on end. We have been tolerant. We have given them the benefit of the doubt. Up until now, we’ve been in retreat of islam and acceding to its every demands at every step of the way…

The thing is, it’s not illegal to dislike certain aspects of certain cultures. It’s not illegal to be racist even (although governments and corporations are trying hard to change that). And it’s not illegal for anyone to say them either (at least where I live). Better, I think, to say what is on one’s mind than to bottle up all of these frustrations inside. Don’t you think? I mean, words alone can never –will never– do as much harm as physical harm itself. Can it?

With that said, I personally think this terror attack is one Westerners way of saying something along the lines of, for example:

We’ve had enough of your stupid violent religion and we don’t want to see any more of it. We too can be violent. We’ve had enough of extremists, terrorists, acid attacks, misogyny, sexism, inequality, female genital mutilation, honor crimes, rapes, gang rapes, paedo rapes, paedo gang rapes, grooming gangs, stonings, homophobia, transphobia, judeophobia, dogophobia, swinophobia. We’ve had enough of muslim bullies at school threatening to get their cousins to bash us up. We’ve had enough. We’re sick of you lot not integrating properly. We’re sick of ultra-conservative muslims only thinking in terms of black and white with absolutely no in-between. We’re sick of you thinking you’re superior. We’re sick of our own governments giving you special concessions. We’re sick of our governments giving you aid money which you don’t even appreciate. We’re sick of hearing that you think everyone else is going to hell. We’re sick of being treated like second class citizens in our own freakin’ countries. We’re sick of hearing the word “muslim”. Just remember one thing: you haven’t taken it. We’ve conceded it. And that’s been our choice, not yours. Now, you’re really testing our limits of patience. We’re not cowards and we’re prepared to defend ourselves. Just appreciate what you’ve got, what we’ve obligingly any voluntarily conceded to you during this time and shut the fuck up already. Lay low.

These days, there’s almost no escaping it. And incidentally that’s why this man ultimately chose to New Zealand instead of Australia. As if to say to the world: “Your plan B is fucked now isn’t it? You can’t even move to the South Island of New Zealand.” 

Even the Northern Territory (that’s where Crocodile Dundee was filmed) now has mosques. What are they doing there? To me, that’s Aboriginal land. And islam just doesn’t belong. That raises another valid point; in Australia, indigenous Aborigines are now being forcibly converted to islam, in our very own prison systems! To me, that’s not right. We should be protecting and preserving these cultures. Not homogenising them.

Both the United Kingdom and Western Europe now have a very big problem on their hands with what is essentially muslim segregation. Muslims don’t tend to assimilate. Do they? It’s almost as if islam itself is practically immiscible with other religions. It just doesn’t want to integrate. Not ever.

Take a look at Spain. Centuries ago, in Southern Spain, the Moors invaded. Hundreds of years later, Granada became a walled city. Eventually, the Spanish Inquisition came along and muslims were either converted or killed. I mean, they’d never willingly give up islam, would they? And so they were driven out of Spain, every single last one of them. That was, I think, a multicultural failure. Except that historians don’t see it that way, they only look at the positive aspects of that invasion.

People should really start asking themselves. Did multiculturalism happen like the way it was planned? Do we have people from different backgrounds dispersed evenly over a geographic area? Or do they tend to agglomerate in specific suburbs? The latter. It’s the latter.

Well okay, you might say, that’s normal. People like to hang out with their own. And I’d agree with you. But one problem that needs to be addressed is that people bring their prejudices with them. My Greek ex-brother in law still hates Turkish people, even though he emmigrated here when he was a toddler.

Likewise, Arabs hate Jews. So how come there aren’t any Kosher shops in “Muslim” areas? Well in France, it’s because they get physically attacked. So clearly some people are bringing their hate with them, when they emmigrate, aren’t they? Are muslims eventually going to hate all non-muslims just as much as they hate Jews, or what? Is all this hatred only because Jews are anti-islam; non-muslims? Probably.

Keep in mind that I personally am a greenie. In the last state election, I voted for the green party. At the federal/national election however, I voted One nation. If you’re not familiar with Australian politics, just know that those two political parties are basically polar opposites. Why did I vote for One Nation (for the first time in my life)? Because I don’t want my beloved country turning into a warzone.

 

I think most muslims haven’t quite figured this out yet, but I’m pretty sure that most non-muslims aren’t willing to accept living in a sharia state. It’ll be world war fucking three before non-muslims ever submit to paying muslims a special “jizya” tax.People today are getting very complacent. What do I mean by that? They think the future is simply an extension of the present time and that nothing is going to change significantly. But the fact is that new wars can and do happen. Not just external wars, but internal wars. Civil wars. Having done a lot of research about this since the NZ attack, I’m starting to understand what drives war.

When one looks around the world, the majority of international and internal conflicts happen in places with a significant muslim population. We’re talking about places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya, Chechnya, Myanmar, Sourthen Thailand, Philippines, West Papua, etc. There’s a common denominator here and that common denominator is conservative islam. It’s either trying to take over completely or else get a foothold into other new regions.

Meanwhile, places like Japan, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and the predominantly Catholic countries in South America where there is relatively little muslim immigration – practically zero terror attacks. So. Are kebabs worth the price of terrorism? Until the muslim world sorts itself out, I’m not so sure they are. I’d gladly do without kebabs if it meant I wasn’t at risk of terrorism.