Mother nature herself
I’ve always wanted to catch a lightning storm on film!
We’ve just had two lightning storms in the space of 15 hours. Here’s a video I recorded last night. I’m very pleased that I was able to capture a lightning strike…
Eco search term trends
This is my PhD thesis, today it is exactly 12 years old.
If you’d like to read all about the structure formation of natural opal, this is one of the most complete models of opal formation available anywhere.
Here is the link:
Characterisation of Australian Opals — leslie dean brown
At the time I remember my supervisor said to me that it was one of the most well-presented theses that he had ever seen.
Not necessarily the results, but the quality of the illustrations and I guess you could say the “design layout”.
I always want to be proud of my own work and do things to the best of my ability.
Today I was able to open up my original word document file that was almost 12 years old.
To my surprise, it kept the original formatting and page breaks. And why shouldn’t it? Although I am not so keen on the changes that have been implemented to Microsoft Word between since then.
Okay so truth be told,the original word document came in at 281 pages and the printed copy came in at 282. So something was not right.
It turns out that one graph had to be pushed down by one line and the original date was also restored. I was so paraoid that I would forget to change the date, the field updated itself automatically.
The reason I am doing this and sharing it again here is that my thesis was finally digitised by the UTS library this week, but the quality ain’t all that great, because it was rescanned from the printed page.
Hopefully google robots will scour my site, find the pdf and index it so anyone can access it.
So I’m deciding to generate the pdf myself (I never got around to doing that).
The principle of “the five whys”.
It’s called “the five whys”. And it’s one of the most powerful tools we have at our disposal.
I think more people should use this technique so that we can improve society. What is it? What does it entail?
It was ‘invented’ at the Toyota corporation as a method of determining the root cause of something unwanted. You keep asking the question why, a bit like a bratty little kid who first figures out the true power of the word ‘why’.
The central idea is to keep on asking ourselves the ‘why’ questions — we keep asking ourselves why something is so, even if we might not like the answers.
For example, if we apply the principles of the five whys to depression, we may discover the true cause of depression (at least in some people). Scientists have got to the point that they can determine whether someone is depressed based on their brain chemistry. Right, but do they then ask the further question: what causes those brain chemicals to be different? One line of research will lead to a ‘cure’. But the other will lead to ‘prevention’. Which is better? I already know the answer.
It’s no good knowing about brain chemicals if we don’t know what factor change the chemicals in the first place. Otherwise we will never prevent depression, we will only have a ‘cure’. So I think asking the five whys in terms of depression is a simple but effective approach. I think that is part of the success of the very simple approach to holistice medicine.
And this is why I think psychology is a very powerful and underrated tool. Because psychologists, unlike psychiatrists, get to the root causes. Psychologists are already three steps ahead of the scientists studying brain chemistry. Because first of all, psychologists have already figured this out. Secondly, they are already asking the five whys. In fact, they are asking a hundred or even a thousand whys. And they already know that depression has triggers. It’s their job to look for the triggers.
The triggers in my case are a mixture of genetic and environmental. They are genetic because I’m told that I have the ‘melancholy’ or inhereted type of depression as opposed to aquiring depression. That’s all I know.
I can tell you right now what causes my depression, what triggers it. I’m going to do this in point form:
- Firstly, seeing concrete everywhere. I believe that it’s a horrible ugly material. It’s overused, it’s grey and —unlike nature— it’s very prone to being sprayed with graffiti.
- Suburbs. Yes. suburbs. I generally find suburbs ugly and therefore depressing. Particularly places that have been either not well designed or overdesigned. That includes all forms of urbanisation, land clearing and ‘development’.
- I generally find any place without trees quite literally depressing. So in my opinion, if you’re a town planner or an architect, and you’re reading this, the best thing you can do is a) design around existing trees b) plant more trees (and not just in a hole in the asphalt, because as one person put it: “a tree is a community”)
- Cars with exhaust pipes. Because I have known for some 25 years now about global warming. It’s time to stop producing fucking internal combustion engines already and build more electric-powered cars.
- Grass. I find the patch of mono-specific grass to be unnatural and therefore depressing. I think back gardens need to look more like meadows. That would attract bees and other insects like dragonflies.
- Lately, mowers. Why do we even mow grass? Really, what for? If we don’t like long grass, why did we put it there to start with? Depressing.
Today, that’s all I’d like to talk about. But in future I will return to the subject of the five whys, but next time it will be applied to GMOs.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- …
- 72
- Next Page »