Today I’m going to do things a bit differently.
I‘d like to encourage my followers to read several articles I just found out about. So here are several interesting pieces of news regarding CRISPR, a new gene-editing technique and a couple of links to the first ever completely synthetic, artificial cell:
- http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/monsanto-nets-first-crispr-license-to-modify-crops-with-key-restrictions/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/10/crispr-diagnostics-gene-cutting/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/23/florida-keys-mosquitoes-genetically-modified/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/08/05/mosquitoes-genetically-modified-florida-zika/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/08/18/genetic-code-synthetic-life/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/18/crispr-off-target-effects/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/16/crispr-first-human-trial-cancer/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/21/crispr-experiment-humans/
- https://www.statnews.com/2015/11/17/gene-editing-embryo-crispr/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/02/synthetic-human-genome/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/09/superbugs-antibiotic-resistance-mcr1/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/07/superbug-new-gene-discovery/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/02/project-human-genome-synthesis/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/04/synthetic-genome-church-endy/
- https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/13/harvard-meeting-synthetic-genome/
- http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell-constructed-by-j-craig-venter-institute-researcher/home/
- http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703559004575256470152341984
- https://www.newscientist.com/article/2082278-artificial-cell-designed-in-lab-reveals-genes-essential-to-life/
Please read all of the above articles and educate yourselves. This isn’t in the mainstream news, but it should be.
I should probably state here that I don’t even pretend to know about genetics. I’m not a geneticist, I studied Materials Science.
All I do know is that nature has laws and you cannot break those laws. Bacterial diseases are lifeorms too and they are just as robust and ‘innovative’ as even the cleverest of humans.
I think that scientists often tend to overestimate their own intelligence level, and at the same time, underestimate the resourcefulness of nature itself. I don’t think we can ever fully predict the “revenge effect”. But it is there. The risk is always there.
I’m sure the field of genetics is really, really advanced by now. I’m not saying that it’s not. But the big worry for me is just that— as science becomes more and more and more specialised, people get ‘cleverer’ but they don’t always become ‘wiser’. So to put that another way, the greatest geneticist minds may claim to know all about genes, and they might even be right, but then they cannot also be the greatest experts in ecosystems. The fields of science are that big today that no one can know everything. It’s impossible! That’s the big worry.
“I don’t think it represents the creation of an artificial life form,” said biomedical engineer James Collins at Boston University. “I view this as an organism with a synthetic genome, not as a synthetic organism. It is tough to draw where the line is.” [source]